Comments on: Room Setup – Acoustic Treatment http://arqen.com Sound and gear for your dream studio. Meet the powerfully quiet Phantom DAW computer. Learn the DIY art of recording studio acoustics. Come check it out! Wed, 21 Dec 2022 22:54:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38 By: brandon stroud http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-1210 Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:40:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-1210 what would need to be done in a all in one room (recording/mixing/mastering) in one room and recording live drums,bass,and guitars

]]>
By: bonnyfused http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-1161 Wed, 08 Aug 2018 15:20:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-1161 Hi Tim. Great article!
What if I don’t have a “regular” room (rectangular) as a studio, but more of a complicated situation (like with tilted roof and similar)?
Would you kindly share your suggestions for placement, if I’d post the pics of my studio room/space?
Thanks,
Flavio.

]]>
By: Juan Octavio Lee http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-1155 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 18:13:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-1155 What about treatment for a vocal booth?
I’m trying to treat a small corner at my apartment for voice over recording.
Thanks in advance.

]]>
By: Louis Chan http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-1129 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 05:06:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-1129 Tim, is there a need to place a carpet in front of the first reflection points (n front of the seating position)?

]]>
By: kamal http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-1093 Sun, 09 Apr 2017 14:05:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-1093 hi,i jus wanted to know whether i should flush the sorrround speaker on the wall or on the acoustic panel in my home theatre.

]]>
By: Lloyd Sundal http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-1089 Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:18:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-1089 When was this article published :) thanks in advance.

]]>
By: AzulShiva http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-1016 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:25:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-1016 What do you personally think of Dipole Subwoofers? Have you ever tried one? Never had one myself, but going to.. sounds like you can take it a little easier on the basstraps with these…

]]>
By: Acousti Guard http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-987 Wed, 25 May 2016 09:58:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-987 Thanks for sharing you blog. I am sure we can treat room for high fidelity listening and mixing from your blog. Yes we can use different acoustic treatments for reduce or remove the unnecessary noise coming to our ears.

]]>
By: Tim Perry http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-981 Sun, 08 May 2016 12:11:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-981 Yong, good question. There doesn’t have to be a difference, as both rooms are designed for balanced, transparent listening.

Typical goals of both rooms are to avoid strong early reflections, tighten up the low end, and create some kind of diffuse return.

However, with mixing rooms critical listening is essential, so clarity and neutrality is often given higher priority, while an audiophile listening room may place greater emphasis on envelopment and and tolerate higher decay times to provide liveliness.

Common differences:
– More common to see sidewall diffusion in hi-fi rooms. Mixing/control rooms, especially small ones, are more likely to use pure broadband absorption at the sidewall and ceiling first reflection points to create a well defined reflection free zone and initial signal delay (ISD) gap: http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/reflection-free-zone/#itdg
– More common to see heavier duty bass absorption in mixing and control rooms.
– More common to see lower decay (“reverberation”) times in control rooms.

I’m going to mention a few specific room types you can look up if you’re curious…

A control room designed using the Refection Free Zone (RFZ or LEDE) criteria, with lots of diffusion, would also make a very pleasant audiophile listening room. Other control room concepts that would work are Controlled Image Design (CID), Early Sound Scattering (ESS) and Ambechoic. Any of these concepts could be applied to create a blissful sounding hi-fi room.

However, modelling a hi-fi room after a Non-Environment (NE) control room doesn’t make sense. For pleasure listening it would be excessively dry and clerical, and to achieve a balanced sound in such a dry room is very expensive and requires sacrificing much of the room’s volume for bass absorption.

There are different schools of thought for control / mixing rooms, and some are more relevant than others for audiophile rooms:
-A design that tries to force the room to become completely neutral by absorbing everything (like an NE room) is the wrong approach for the sane audiophile.
-A design that works with the room to achieve a balanced sound (like an RFZ room) is the easiest and most affordable path to high fidelity bliss.

]]>
By: Yong Hwee Lim http://arqen.com/acoustics-101/room-setup-acoustic-treatment/#comment-980 Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:22:00 +0000 http://arqen.com/?page_id=7566#comment-980 Tim, do you think there are any different between acoustic treatment between a mixing room with a audiophile music listening room?

]]>